Empath Test

Answer 32 quick questions about how you typically respond to other people’s emotions, and in about seven minutes you’ll get a clear reading of how strong that response tends to be for you.

Illustration of one person resting a supportive hand on the shoulder of another person who looks down and upset, with a warm glow where their hands meet.
0%
You're having coffee with a close friend who's clearly had a rough week, and you're right in the middle of hearing about it. What's happening to your own mood while they're still talking?
Your friend calls you upset right as you're halfway through cooking dinner, pan already on the stove. What actually happens?
You walk into your kitchen and your two roommates are clearly not speaking to each other, though neither has said a word about why. What does your own body do?
The person ahead of you at the checkout is elderly and struggling to count out exact change while the line waits. What do you feel, right then?
You're sitting with a friend the night before a medical appointment they're dreading, separate from anything you've said to reassure them. What happens to your own mood while you're there with them?
You're helping your sibling move boxes, and the way they want them stacked doesn't match what your own gut says is the more efficient way. What wins, in that moment?
You're at a friend's birthday party - loud music, everyone dancing, energy through the roof. What happens to your own energy by the end of the night?
You watch a customer get talked over and dismissed by a coworker who isn't yours to manage, in a situation that has nothing to do with you. What do you feel, on the spot?
Thinking back over recent conversations with your partner, how often have you caught your own face shifting to match theirs - falling, brightening, tensing - before you'd registered why?
You're watching a coworker get told, in front of everyone, about a promotion they've wanted for years. What happens to you, right as it's happening?
Thinking about your conversations generally, how often do you notice you've been unconsciously copying the other person's posture or gestures - sitting or moving to match them - without having planned to?
A coworker is crying in the break room. How often do you catch your own voice softening or your body leaning toward them, before you've decided to comfort them at all?
Your roommate is on the phone with customer service, voice rising, clearly furious, and it has nothing to do with you. What happens to your own irritation while you're in the room?
Your neighbor is visibly struggling with too many grocery bags and their keys, before either of you has said anything. How often do you notice your own face already showing concern?
You pass a stranger crying alone on a park bench, with no idea why. What happens to you, right at that moment?
You watch someone get mocked in front of a group, right as it's happening, in a conflict that isn't yours. What do you actually do?
Later that night, thinking back on the coffee with your friend who'd had a rough week, do you find your own mood had actually ended up matching theirs?
Thinking back on times you've stayed on the phone with an upset friend while dinner burned or plans fell through, how much did that cost actually weigh against your pull to be there, looking back?
In that same kind of quiet kitchen tension between people who haven't said what's wrong, do you catch yourself scanning the room or checking their faces?
When you feel that pull of tenderness toward someone struggling in a checkout line, does it ever turn into something you actually do - helping bag, offering to cover the difference, saying something kind?
Think back to that specific night sitting with a friend before something they were dreading. Looking back, can you identify your own anxiety having risen, separate from anything you'd reasoned through?
Think back to helping your sibling move. Looking back, did what they actually asked for carry more weight than your own sense of the more efficient way?
You spend an evening at a quiet, subdued family dinner after some bad news. What happens to your own energy afterward?
After watching that customer get talked over, does the protective concern you felt tend to stick with you - bringing it up later, checking in on how it was handled?
Has your partner ever pointed out, right in the moment, that your face had already shifted to match theirs before you'd registered it yourself?
Looking back on watching that coworker get their promotion news, were you surprised, in hindsight, at how moved you'd gotten by it?
Mid-conversation, is there a specific moment where you suddenly realize you've already been sitting or gesturing just like the other person, without having planned to?
Has a coworker ever told you that you'd already started comforting them - a softened voice, leaning in - before you'd consciously decided to?
Shortly after your roommate's angry phone call, do you ever find yourself short or on edge with someone else entirely unrelated, and trace it back to that call?
Has your neighbor ever told you afterward that your face had shown visible concern before anything had actually been said?
Looking back at that stranger crying on the park bench, with no idea what it was about, do you recognize that you'd become visibly emotional yourself, despite still not knowing why?
Think of a time you watched someone get mocked but ultimately didn't step in. Looking back, how strong was the pull to do something anyway?

Your results are no accident

The classic 16-type personality test rooted in Jung's typology has been rebuilt from the ground up: a new CoreTypes methodology, and a far higher level of accuracy. These might be the most useful ten minutes you'll ever spend on yourself: you walk away with the key to your decisions, your relationships and your results — and it's yours for good.

Take the free test

Frequently Asked Questions

Is being an empath a real, scientifically recognized thing?

The individual pieces this test measures - feeling pulled into someone else's emotional state, and feeling concern strong enough to act on it - are real, well-documented patterns, and everyone has some level of each. What the research behind this test does not support is "empath" as a discrete category a person either is or isn't. There's no scientific cutoff separating "empaths" from everyone else; it's a continuous trait, measured here as a level on a scale, not a box you either fit into or don't.

Can a mental health professional diagnose someone as an empath?

No. "Empath" isn't a diagnostic category any clinician assigns - it doesn't appear in any diagnostic manual, and no professional test certifies it. What you get here is a self-reported reading on one scale, not a diagnosis. If a response like this ever feels genuinely overwhelming to manage on your own, that's worth a real conversation with a professional, not something a quiz result can settle.

What's the difference between an empath and a highly sensitive person (HSP)?

The two labels overlap a lot in everyday use, but they're measured as distinct traits. "Highly sensitive" describes general reactivity to your own sensory environment - light, sound, texture, a crowded room - regardless of whether anyone else is involved. What this test measures is specifically interpersonal: feeling and responding to other people's emotional states. Your result here says nothing about how you handle sensory input on its own; that's a separate test's territory.

Can empaths really feel other people's physical pain?

Not in the literal sense sometimes claimed. What actually happens, and what this test is built to measure, is emotional contagion - your own emotional state shifting to match someone else's, not a physical sensation transferring between bodies. A separate, rare phenomenon exists in a small share of people that comes closer to a literal description, but it isn't what an ordinary score on a test like this one reflects.

Why doesn't this test give a separate score for emotional boundaries or overwhelm?

Because that's a genuinely different outcome, not a bigger number on the same scale. This test deliberately combines two things that behave as one pattern - being pulled into someone else's emotional state, and that pull turning into warmth or action. Feeling overwhelmed by what you've picked up from someone else, instead of moved to help them, is a separate result a strong response can lead to, not more or less of the same thing - so it's discussed in what a strong result means, kept out of the number itself.

Share this test

Methodology

This test is based on the approach of treating the popularly-known "empath" trait as two related, continuously distributed patterns, not one fixed category: how strongly someone resonates with other people's emotional states, and how much of that resonance turns into concern that motivates helping them. The two are summed into one level - a self-reported degree of pull and follow-through, not how accurately those states were read in the first place.

It's built from 32 first-person statements, two for each of 16 independently documented ways this pattern shows up, each with five graduated answers. Your total places you in one of five levels, narrower near the middle and wider toward the edges, matched to how real answers tend to cluster.

Two limits are worth naming: this is a self-report measure of what you believe about your own pattern, not an observed one, and it deliberately leaves out a third, related pattern - a strong pull resolving into self-focused overwhelm, warmth nowhere in it - because folding it in would blur two different outcomes into one line; where it matters, it's named directly in the results instead.

For a closer look, the APA's definition of empathy explains why "being moved" and "being moved to help" aren't automatically the same thing, and Greater Good's overview of empathy covers where a strong pull like this can tip into overwhelm. "Empath" itself isn't a recognized clinical category, and this test doesn't diagnose it - it reports a self-described level on one scale, nothing more.

References

  1. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126.
  2. Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55(1), 19–39.
  3. Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2014). Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(6), 873–879.
  4. Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96–100.