All tests
Personality Type

Values Test

Questions: 24Time: ≈ 5 min

Answer 24 short scenarios and pick whichever option feels closest to how you’d actually act. At the end, you’ll see which of four value orientations is pulling strongest for you right now, along with how you land across all four — in about 5 minutes.

Start the test
Illustration of a person standing inside a circle divided into four scenes: an open door, a mountain peak, a house under a tree, and hands passing a small plant.
0%
A shared group chat is splitting a bill everyone paid into differently, and there's already a house rule for exactly this.
You finish a task that took real effort, and nobody happens to mention it.
Your regular week gets rearranged out of nowhere: the places, the timing, the order of things.
A friend hasn't said anything is wrong, but something in how they've been lately catches your attention.
How do you tend to approach a decision that actually matters to you?
What actually tells you something went well?
The news is full of a long-standing institution or set of rules suddenly being questioned or rewritten.
How would people close to you describe relying on you?
Someone hands you a ready-made plan for something you're about to take on — and it would genuinely be the easier road to just follow it.
A small group you're part of needs to decide something, and nobody has spoken up yet.
A small custom from earlier years could easily be skipped this time, with no one likely to mind either way.
A decision needs making that will affect a group of people you will never personally meet.
There's a pull, in general, between a plan you've worked out yourself and one someone else has already handed you.
There's a pull, in general, toward being the one who decides for a group rather than simply following along.
A written procedure has a shortcut built into it that nobody would ever catch you taking.
There's a pull, in general, to weigh environmental impact into an everyday choice without anyone prompting you to.
Two ways to spend a free stretch of time are on the table: one you already know well, one you've never tried.
An unexpectedly large amount of money lands in your hands, and you get to decide what happens to it.
Someone close says something you honestly disagree with, in a moment where saying so would clearly sting.
Someone lays out a view that runs completely against how you see things.
A long stretch with the same routine repeats itself, day after day, without much changing.
What are resources — money, time, whatever you have — mainly good for, in your own head?
What's your own pull toward the customs you grew up around?
Where does your own sense of fairness actually land?

Your results are no accident

The classic 16-type personality test rooted in Jung's typology has been rebuilt from the ground up: a new CoreTypes methodology, and a far higher level of accuracy. These might be the most useful ten minutes you'll ever spend on yourself: you walk away with the key to your decisions, your relationships and your results — and it's yours for good.

Take the free test

How this test works

Methodology

This test builds on decades of work looking at how people describe what matters to them, work that kept turning up the same shape: personal priorities sort into four broad pulls instead of sitting on one flat list. A value, in that sense, is one of the standards someone leans on to decide what's worth chasing or shielding.

Your 24 answers sort into those four pulls and build a full picture across all of them, not a single flat number — the strongest pull gets named directly, while the other three still sit on your results screen. What comes back is where you stand right now, not a fixed type — priorities like these keep moving across a lifetime, more so in the earlier years. No pull here beats another, and the test doesn't stretch into recommending a job, a relationship, or a direction for your life; it only names what's strongest.

Two of the four borders between pulls shade into each other, even in the underlying research on how these values are measured, so a result sitting near an edge reads as overlap rather than a clean split.

Like most tools in this space, this one relies on self-report — what you say about your own priorities, not an outside measurement of how you actually act day to day — and self-report carries a known habit of rating agreeable-sounding answers a touch higher than daily behavior would.

Frequently Asked Questions About Personal Values

What are personal values?

Personal values work like a quiet filter: they decide what even looks worth pursuing before you get anywhere near weighing the actual details of a choice. They're the reasons behind your reasons, mostly unspoken.

Do personal values change as you get older?

Yes — the research keeps finding real movement in people's priorities across a lifetime, with the biggest shifts clustering in the earlier adult years. Retaking something like this down the line, just to compare, is a perfectly ordinary thing people do, not a signal that the earlier answer was off.

Will this tell me which career or relationship suits me?

No. What comes back is a single strongest pull among your answers, nothing more — the test has no opinion on a job, a partner, or which road to take next.

How is a values test different from a personality test?

A personality test maps how you tend to act — patterns that hold fairly steady once adulthood settles in. This kind of test maps what you're chasing or guarding, and that part moves with you as circumstances and years pass.

Is there a limit to how many core values someone can hold?

A list stretching into the dozens stops working as anything you could actually act on day to day. That's part of the reason this test folds a long list of narrower priorities into four broader pulls instead of handing back dozens of separate numbers.

References

  1. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116
  2. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the Theory of Basic Individual Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.
  3. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
4.8/5