Crush Test
Answer all 20 questions honestly, about how you feel toward one specific person. It takes about 4 minutes, and at the end you’ll get an actual name for what that feeling currently is.
Easy Company: Friendly Attachment
Across this set of twenty answers, what you're feeling toward this person reads as friendly attachment - warmth and closeness with this one person, without a pull toward exclusivity and without the charged, idealized edge a crush or a deeper romantic pull tends to carry.
It shows up as steadiness more than spark: their company feels calm and easy on an ordinary day, and describing them to someone new sounds like any good friend, not like a story that keeps growing in the telling.
The real strength here: nothing about this closeness demands resolution. No open question sits underneath it, no next step it's quietly pushing you toward.
The trade-off worth naming: this state can sit right next to an actual crush without much telling them apart from the inside, which is part of why a check like this one is useful. And with four states splitting the same twenty answers, this is simply the lead this pass through the test produced - the margin may have been narrow, and a different day could read differently. None of this says anything about how the other person feels, or whether this closeness could ever become something else.
A Spark You Notice: Liking
Across this set of twenty answers, what you're feeling toward this person reads as liking with a live spark - real warmth plus a bit of emotional charge and attention, short of any wish for exclusivity.
It shows up as a flicker more than a flame: a slightly more colorful description than you'd give of anyone else, a stray 'what if' that passes through and gets let go, a flutter that turns up now and then without asking for anything.
The strength of this one is that it costs you nothing - you get to enjoy the spark without it demanding a decision from you either way.
The trade-off is that a mild, genuine spark is easy to talk yourself out of noticing, or to file away as more settled than it actually is. And with four states splitting the answers to twenty questions, this is simply where this particular pass through the test landed - the margin could have been slim, and it says nothing about whether the spark grows, fades, or matters to anyone besides you right now.
All In, Right Now: Crush
Across this set of twenty answers, what you're feeling toward this person reads as a crush - a pull toward exclusivity paired with a charge that's still building, not yet settled into anything steadier.
It shows up loudly: thought that returns on its own during things that have nothing to do with them, a picture of them that leans on idealized impressions more than the full ordinary person, a wish for the feeling to be known and returned that sits right at the front of your mind.
The strength here is clarity - this is the state that's hardest to miss once it's actually named, and you've named it.
The trade-off is built into the charge itself: the same idealization giving it its intensity also means the picture you're carrying of this person is, by definition, incomplete right now. And with four states splitting the answers to twenty questions, this is where this particular pass landed, not a permanent fact about you - it says nothing about whether the feeling is returned, or what, if anything, you do next.
Steadier Than It Started: Settling Into Love
Across this set of twenty answers, what you're feeling toward this person reads as something that's already settling into love - a pull toward exclusivity that's moved past its early charge into something steadier.
It shows up as calm rather than urgency: being around them feels secure even though it's clearly more than friendship, the idealized edges have worn into a fuller, more ordinary picture, and the wanting that used to feel pressing has settled into something closer to an assumption.
The real strength is stability - this is the version of the feeling that depends least on uncertainty to stay alive.
The trade-off worth naming: steadiness this quiet can get mistaken for the feeling being smaller or less real than it is, simply because it stopped being loud. And with four states splitting the answers to twenty questions, this is where this particular pass through the test landed - it doesn't confirm that the other person's feelings have settled the same way, or that anything about the relationship's status has actually changed.
Your results are no accident
The classic 16-type personality test rooted in Jung's typology has been rebuilt from the ground up: a new CoreTypes methodology, and a far higher level of accuracy. These might be the most useful ten minutes you'll ever spend on yourself: you walk away with the key to your decisions, your relationships and your results — and it's yours for good.
Take the free testFrequently Asked Questions
What actually makes something a crush?
A crush is a specific, one-sided kind of fondness for one particular person - not a description of what they feel back, just a name for what's going on in you. It sits apart from general friendliness (it's aimed at one person, not people in general) and apart from an established relationship (it doesn't require anything to have been said or agreed on). It's nameable entirely from your own experience - nothing about the other person needs to be established first.
How is a crush different from just being close friends?
From the outside, warm attention toward one particular person can look the same whether it's friendship or something more - the two can be genuinely hard to tell apart by watching. From the inside they usually feel different: friendship-register fondness reads as closeness without a pull toward exclusivity, while a crush carries that pull plus a charge that's still building. This test's four categories are built specifically to separate those two registers for one person at a time - never by looking at anything about how that person is behaving.
How can I tell if this has become love, rather than just a crush?
The difference isn't really about how strong the feeling is - a crush can feel enormous and love can feel quiet. It's about shape: a crush is an early, charged pull that leans on idealized, still-incomplete impressions, while something further along has calmed into a steadier, fuller-picture version of the same pull. This test places your current answers on that shape, not on an intensity score, which is why a strong crush and an established, settled feeling can land in genuinely different categories even though both are intense in their own way.
What are the actual signs that point to liking someone?
This test looks at three kinds of signs, all on your own side of things: what comes to mind unprompted when you're not trying to think about them, what happens physically or emotionally when you're actually around them, and what's changed in your own choices and behavior because of the feeling. None of it looks at what the other person is thinking, feeling, or doing - those questions live entirely outside what this test can honestly answer.
Methodology
This test is based on two long-studied distinctions in how people describe fondness for another person: liking versus loving - warmth and closeness without a pull toward exclusivity, versus a pull toward exclusivity itself - and passionate versus companionate love, an early, still-building, idealized charge versus a steadier, calmer one. Twenty everyday questions about one specific person place your own answers on those two distinctions.
What it measures is where your own current thought, feeling, and behavior patterns toward this one person sit on those two distinctions, based on a single pass through the test. It's a reading of this particular set of answers, not a permanent trait score.
Limitations worth knowing: this is a single-session self-report snapshot, not a stable trait measurement, and a different day could read differently. It says nothing about the other person's thoughts, feelings, or likely response - the whole test stays on your side of the situation. It isn't a compatibility test, a fate or soulmate assessment, or a prediction about where the relationship goes, and it isn't a clinical or diagnostic instrument.
For more on the underlying distinction between these two registers of love, see the APA's entry on passionate love and its entry on companionate love.
References
- Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 265–273. doi:10.1037/h0029841
- Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9(4), 383–410. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(86)80043-4
- American Psychological Association. APA Dictionary of Psychology — entries "passionate love" and "companionate love."
- Bowker, J. C., Spencer, S. V., Thomas, K. K., & Gyoerkoe, E. A. (2012). Having and being an other-sex crush during early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(4), 629–643. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.008