Jealousy Test

Answer all 20 questions the way you honestly are, not how you think you should be. It takes about 4 minutes, and at the end you’ll get a plain reading of how strong your jealousy tendency currently runs.

What does it take for the thought that your partner might be drawn to someone else to show up in your mind? You'd need to actually catch something on your own - a message, a scene, not a guess - before the thought about someone else even forms. It takes something genuinely out of the ordinary - your partner mentioning the same name three times in a week, say - before the thought shows up at all. A new coworker's name coming up over dinner, mentioned twice without much thought, and the idea is already sitting there. A slightly later reply than usual, or a name you don't recognize lighting up the screen, and the thought is already running. Nothing in particular has to happen at all - the thought is often there before you've even picked up your phone to check.

You picture someone else stepping into your place with your partner. How long does the sadness that follows tend to stick around? The picture passes and takes nothing with it - a minute later you're back to whatever you were doing, untouched. A quick stab of sadness shows up, already fading before you'd think to name it. Real sadness sticks around for a while this time, noticeably, before it eventually eases away. Even once the picture itself has faded, a low mood keeps running underneath the rest of your afternoon. The sadness stays woven into the rest of the day, coloring everything else you do, regardless of how that particular moment wraps up.

How small a reason is enough to send you scrolling through your partner's phone, messages, or social media without them knowing? Looking through their phone unasked simply isn't something you do, whatever happens; nothing about any of it tips you into it. Only the single most alarming kind of thing - a name popping up at 2am, say - would ever push you to look. Something not especially dramatic is already enough - a photo you weren't tagged in, a comment that reads a little too familiar. A fairly ordinary thing does it - a notification you happened to glimpse, a new like on an old photo. Almost nothing is needed - the urge to check is there before you've even worked out why.

Your partner has a close friend who could plausibly become more than a friend. How often does wanting to shape or limit that friendship come up for you? It comes up again and again - you'll catch yourself thinking, mid-conversation with them about something else entirely, that you wish they saw less of that friend. It resurfaces often enough that you could point to it - maybe once every couple of weeks, a version of the same thought. It comes and goes in roughly equal measure - weeks where it crosses your mind, weeks where that friendship doesn't occur to you at all. It surfaces every so often, as a single passing thought you don't act on and barely remember having. It never crosses your mind at all - that friendship simply isn't something you find yourself thinking about, one way or the other.

Think back on a past interaction your partner had with someone else. How much do you turn it over afterward, looking for a meaning you might have missed? It stays exactly what it looked like at the time - nothing about it gets re-examined. Every so often something will catch your eye about it, just briefly, and that's as far as it goes. Some interactions get turned over properly - you'll actually sit with what a certain look or comment might have meant. Interactions get gone over in real detail on a regular basis, well after the moment itself is over. You pick it apart and replay it until every possible meaning has been considered, more than once.

You picture your partner's interest drifting toward someone else. How hot does the anger that follows run? Picturing it doesn't produce anger in you at all - if anything, its absence is what you'd notice first. Something hot sparks for a second and is gone again before you've even fully registered it happened. A real burst of heat rises this time and takes a while to work its way back down. It comes on fast and stays hot - the heat is still there long after the picture itself has faded. Once it catches, it doesn't cool on its own - you have to actively work through it before it lets go.

Once something has triggered your suspicion, how far does the questioning about where your partner was and who they were with tend to go? A trigger comes and goes without turning into any questions at all - you don't ask, whatever set it off. One question slips out - "how was it?" maybe - and once it's answered you actually let it go. It grows into two or three questions, circling the same thing, before you finally let the matter drop. You keep steering the conversation back to the same point, asking it a slightly different way each time. You'll bring it up again the next day, and maybe the day after that, until every last detail has been gone over.

With nothing having happened, how many different ways do you try to cut down the time your partner spends with someone who could plausibly become a rival? You let it be, whatever amount of time they spend together: acting on it just isn't something you do. A passing comment here and there, and that's the extent of it. A couple of different approaches get tried now and then - a suggestion, a scheduling nudge. Several different approaches get used fairly regularly - comments, plans that quietly compete, and more. Something is always being tried - there's rarely a stretch where you're not doing at least one thing about it.

Your partner explains where they were and what they were doing. How completely does that settle the matter for you? The explanation barely has time to land before a new doubt is already opening up in its place. You believe it for an evening, maybe two, and then a new doubt quietly starts up again. Some explanations settle it completely; others leave you turning the same thing back over within the hour. Most of the time it genuinely settles and stays settled, with maybe one new doubt slipping in every so often. Once they've told you, that's genuinely the end of it - nothing new comes up about it again, not that day or any day after.

You picture your partner's attention shifting toward someone else. How far does your own sense of standing drop? Your sense of standing doesn't move an inch - the picture simply doesn't touch how you see yourself. A small twinge registers somewhere, so slight your sense of standing stays essentially where it was. Something genuinely uncomfortable registers this time - a clear slip in how you feel about yourself - and then it passes once the moment does. What follows is hard to shake off this time - a real hit to how you see yourself that colors the rest of your day. It feels like the ground actually gives way under you for a moment - not a passing feeling, but something closer to falling.

In the moment something triggers you, how visibly does your displeasure show to your partner? Whatever the trigger, nothing shows - your partner wouldn't know anything had happened. A sign slips out well after the fact - maybe you're quieter than usual at dinner - and it's easy enough for them to miss. Something shows in the moment itself without being dramatic - your face falls, or your tone shifts, enough to notice. Your partner can read it off your face within seconds - there's no mistaking that something just shifted. It's written all over you the second it happens - whoever's in the room would catch it, not just your partner.

A social occasion is coming up where a plausible rival would be within reach. How hard do you push to keep your partner away from it? The occasion gets left entirely alone, whoever else is going to be there; you don't say a word about it. You might drop an offhand line about it, easy enough to laugh off, with nothing really behind it. You'll actually ask them, once, to skip it or at least keep it short. You bring it up more than once, each time a little more insistent, pushing for them to skip it or leave early. You keep at it until they're not going at all - whatever reason gets offered for the occasion, you push back on all of it.

Nothing has happened, and nothing points that way. How long does a spell of worry about your partner someday being unfaithful run, once it starts? That possibility just isn't something your mind goes to - it doesn't cross your thinking at all. Every so often it crosses your mind for a moment, and then it's gone as quickly as it came. Some weeks it genuinely takes hold of your thinking for a while; other weeks it doesn't come up once. It's not fleeting once it starts - expect it to still be there hours later, fading only gradually. Once it starts, it doesn't really stop - just when you think you've set it aside, it's back again, sometimes for days.

Picture your partner genuinely close with someone who could plausibly become a rival. How vivid does that picture have to get before it carries any real weight for you? Even the vaguest version - just the idea of them standing a little too close somewhere - already sits heavy with you. A fairly ordinary version does it: knowing they had coffee together and talked for an hour is already enough to sit with you. It takes something a good deal more specific - a real scene, not just a fact - before it actually gets to you. It would have to be an oddly detailed, almost scripted version - down to where they were sitting - before it landed at all. It stays exactly that: a picture, nothing that actually reaches you, no matter how detailed or specific it gets.

Something happens involving the third person themselves. How often do you take it up with them directly, rather than keeping it between you and your partner? It stays strictly between you and your partner, whatever happens - the third person never hears about it from you. Only something genuinely serious - not a passing comment, something real - would ever get raised with them directly. A comment that felt pointed might get raised with them directly; a passing glance wouldn't. Almost anything beyond the mildest, most forgettable moment gets taken up with them directly rather than staying between you two. Almost nothing stays just between you and your partner; even the smallest incident ends up taken up with the third person directly.

Your partner has an upcoming work trip or project that puts them in extended contact with someone who could plausibly become a rival. How much contact does it take before you feel some adjustment is called for? Even a single dinner together on a work trip is enough that you'd want something to change about it. A single lunch or coffee passes without you needing anything to change; a longer stretch together is what does it. A multi-day trip or a months-long project prompts you to want some change about half the time, and half the time it doesn't. A week-long conference together usually passes without you needing anything to change; only the rare, months-long project does. It never once occurs to you that anything should change, whether the trip runs a single week or the project keeps them close for months.

Be honest with yourself: how much of your overall sense of security rests on this one relationship? If this relationship ended tomorrow, your sense of security would carry on exactly as it is now. A small piece of it, maybe - losing this relationship would sting, then life would carry on largely as it was. A meaningful chunk of it rests here - losing this would genuinely shake things up, without completely rewriting who you are. Most of your footing comes from this relationship - losing it would knock out something you lean on daily. Take this relationship away and there's not much sense of security left standing on its own.

A scene of your partner's closeness with someone else gets described to you, or comes to mind on its own. How much does your body register it? Your body stays completely uninvolved - if the scene registers at all, it stays purely as an idea. Something small stirs in your chest for a second, gone before you've quite placed what it was. A real physical reaction shows up this time - tight chest, restless stomach - and it takes a while to settle. A strong physical reaction sets in and stays there, refusing to fade even once your attention has moved elsewhere. Your whole body reacts before your thinking has even caught up - for a moment there's nothing else going on.

Something triggers you. How often does it pass without you checking or establishing anything at all - not because you decide against it, but because no pull to look shows up in the first place? Any trigger still ends in at least some verifying act, however small - a glance at a phone, a quick question. Nine times out of ten you'll still glance at something or ask a small question; it's rare for a trigger to pass completely unchecked. It could go either way about equally - sometimes a trigger passes with nothing done about it, other times you still end up checking something small. These days most triggers come and go without you doing anything about them; every once in a while you'll still glance at something, almost out of habit. It simply passes, every time, with nothing to check or establish - not because you catch an urge and set it aside, but because no urge shows up to begin with.

Across the different situations where an opportunity for a rival could come up, how consistently do you prefer to arrange things ahead of time so it never arises, rather than dealing with it after the fact? You don't really plan around it anywhere - every situation just gets dealt with once something's actually happened. There's exactly one kind of situation - work trips, say - where you plan ahead like this; everywhere else you just react. Some situations get this kind of forward planning - trips, certain nights out - and others you only deal with after they've happened. By now it reaches almost every kind of situation you can think of, with only the odd exception left to chance. There's no situation left to chance anymore - if an opportunity could exist, you've already planned around it before it does.

Your results are no accident

The classic 16-type personality test rooted in Jung's typology has been rebuilt from the ground up: a new CoreTypes methodology, and a far higher level of accuracy. These might be the most useful ten minutes you'll ever spend on yourself: you walk away with the key to your decisions, your relationships and your results — and it's yours for good.

Take the free test

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it normal to feel jealous, and is all jealousy bad?

Research treats jealousy as a continuum rather than something you either have or don't - the everyday stretch of that continuum is simply the ordinary working of a common emotion. What actually varies from person to person is intensity, and intensity within a romantic relationship is exactly what this test measures. Feeling it sometimes doesn't put you in a special category; it's familiar to almost everyone.

What's the difference between jealousy and envy?

Jealousy involves three people - you, your partner, and someone else - and centers on the fear of losing a relationship you value. Envy involves only two people and centers on wanting something someone else has. This test measures only the first: nothing in it asks whether you want what somebody else has.

What does this jealousy test actually tell me?

It places your self-reported intensity on a single scale, built from four kinds of manifestation: suspicious thinking, emotional upset, checking behavior after something triggers you, and acting ahead of events before anything has happened. It hands back a level, not a type - and it doesn't assess your relationship or your partner.

Why am I so jealous?

Research links how strongly this trait runs to how much of a person's sense of security rests on the relationship, and to how replaceable the relationship feels to them. This test measures level, not cause - your result doesn't identify why you feel the way you do, only how strongly the pattern currently shows up.

Can jealousy be managed or reduced?

The intensity this test measures is a separate question from what you actually do once jealousy shows up - and the documented range there runs from talking it through and repairing the bond, to going quiet, to monitoring, to turning it back on your partner. That second question, not the level itself, is what coping approaches actually address - which is also why this test scores intensity only and deliberately leaves expression style out of it.

Methodology

This test is based on the approach of measuring jealousy as a single dispositional intensity, built from several kinds of manifestation that show up separately: suspicious thinking about a partner and a possible rival, the emotional charge a rival scenario produces, checking behavior once something has triggered you, and shaping a partner's contacts before anything has actually happened.

It asks twenty first-person questions on one shared five-step scale, with some of them keyed in reverse so agreement doesn't always push your total upward. The twenty answers sum into a single score, which is then split into four levels at the points where this scale's own steps genuinely shift from one meaning to the next - not into four equal slices.

This is a self-report reading of how strong the pattern runs, not a verdict on whether any specific thing you do is a problem in your particular relationship, and it says nothing about your partner. It covers the romantic frame only, and a single total can come from very different mixtures of thinking, feeling, checking, and acting ahead of events - two people with the same result can look quite different day to day. For background on how jealousy is defined and how it has been studied, see the linked references. This test is not a diagnostic instrument and does not replace a qualified professional's assessment.